|
|
 |
| Product |
| A Christmas Carol (50th Anniversary Edition) (REGION 1) (NTSC) |
|
|
A good film marred by deviations from the original story
This 1951 adaptation of A Christmas Carol, starring Alastair Sim as Ebenezer Scrooge, is hailed by many as the best adaptation of Charles Dickens timeless Christmas story. Certainly, it is a very good movie more than capable of bringing a tear to your eye as you witness Scrooges rebirth as a man who vows to keep the Christmas spirit in his heart every day of the year, but I must admit being rather bothered by the way this presentation oftentimes wanders far afield of the original storyline. The film does tell the story in all of its larger facets in the proper way, but it often takes its own path toward the predetermined destination. This is noticeable very early on, as some of my favorite lines from the story are paraphrased and expressed in different terms than what I was expecting. Such a reworking of the dialogue becomes a trademark of this production, but this in and of itself is something of a quibbling matter. What strikes me as much more serious, however, is the fact that this film presents scenes that do not exist in Dickens story and to some degree rewrites what actually was written. All of these innovations, which I see as quite needless, take something away from the full effect of this powerful story upon me.It is interesting to watch the manner in which these filmmakers of mid-century presented the four spirits that visit Scrooge in the early hours of Christmas morning. Jacob Marley and the ghosts of Christmas Past, Present, and Future are basically shown as mere reflections of sorts, very lightly translucent beings, and I must say this works fine, especially since this is a film of the heart in which special effects are largely incidental. I would have liked to see Marleys mouth drop open dramatically once he removed the sling on his head, but there were many little things such as this I looked for in vain in this particular adaptation. Of much more consequence, though, are the changes and additions to the script one finds here. As the film progresses, Dickens story is at times drastically rewritten. There are needless scenes, such as the one where Scrooge stops to eat on his way home, only to then take up a bowl of porridge once he arrives in his sitting room. We are shown the death scene of Scrooges beloved sister, non-Christmas scenes featuring the avaricious young duo of Scrooge and Marley (with the young Marley played by Patrick MacNee of future Avengers fame) making their way up in business, and other scenes Dickens never described directly. Most galling of all, at least to me, is the view we have of Scrooges one-time fiancés life as a mature woman; it could not be more different than the life Dickens describes to us. The looks at Christmases past seem to take undue time here, leaving the visions of present and future Christmas days too little time to achieve their utmost effect. Even Tiny Tim is in a sense given the short shrift. The film makes up for its shortcomings to some degree at the end, but even Christmas morning is marred by the insertion of a servant you wont find in Dickens original story. Alastair Sim makes a memorable Ebenezer Scrooge, but his performance falls far short of George C. Scotts later portrayal of Scrooge as Dickens envisioned him. This 1951 version of A Christmas Carol is a notably good retelling of the Christmas classic, but I much prefer adaptations that actually present the story as it was written.
|
Classic version of a classic
Due to the circumstances and choices in the life of Ebenezer Scrooge, he has chosen money over mankind. His partner now seven years dead comes back to warn Ebenezer of his afterlife fate if he does not change his ways. To assist in this task are three spirits, Christmas past (his past), Christmas present, and Christmas of things to come. Can or will Ebenezer change his ways? Why should he?There are many versions of this tale floating around out there including study books and animated movies. Of all these versions a few stand out. This is one of the versions that come to mind. Made in the era of black and white, one can not help but shun any attempt to colorize it. The Alastair Sim version is a product of its day and he does a very good job of portraying Ebenezer Scrooge. He comes across as mean in his speech of “are there no work houses?” and stingy, displayed during his meal, upon hearing that more bread will cost he says, “No more bread.” On Christmas morning he goes overboard with the maniacal laughter. This is probably emphasized to show his change of heart and to allow him to scare the maid. However it does distract from the story. The story is modified a bit but unless you have been reading the book you will not notice this. To tie his childhood memories of his sister to his present day nephew, they play “Barbra Allen” in the back ground (nice touch.) All in all this will make a nice addition to you Christmas collection.
|
truly as close as if dickens made the film
an excellent rendition of dickens masterpiece with the added advantage of watching it in colour as well as the original black & white. Alastair Simm at his finest.
|

|
|
|
|
|